Cultivation Environment Control and Plant Growth Monitoring in Greenhouse using Sensors, Communication Network and Data Processing Technologies : A review

Research
Seung-Yun Baek1Yong-Joo Kim12Nam-Gyu Lee3*

Abstract

The world population growth is increasing the demand for food production. Moreover, declining labor force and rising production costs in rural areas suggests the need for new methods of food production. Smart farming is a concept that may use sensors and related technologies to overcome the current challenges of food production. Smart farming is largely classified into soil management, environmental control, and plant growth monitoring, and each item uses various sensors, platforms, and related technologies. The review aims to identify the sensors, embedded system platforms, communication network technologies and the data processing technologies of greenhouse. Cloud and big data computing technologies for processing large amounts of data, and data are mainly used for the management of the recent greenhouse. Moreover, recent studies have confirmed that the use of artificial intelligence technology to maintain or improve the environment of smart agriculture has become commonplace. In the future study, it is necessary to develop technologies applicable to greenhouses through the expansion of big data and AI technologies mainly used for plant monitoring.

Keyword



Introduction

According to future of food and agriculture report of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the world population is expected to increase by about 10 billion by 2050, which means that more agricultural production is needed (FAO 2017). To solve these problems, many researchers around the world are carrying out studies to increase agricultural productivity (Dhall and Agrawal, 2018; Verdouw et al., 2019). The plant grows in the limited space artificially adjust and control the environmental conditions such as humidity, airflow, temperature, CO2, light intensity. The plant production with innovative ideas and technological advances such as sensor system, wireless sensor network has been able to increase production and allocate more efficient resources (Ray, 2016). For example, farmers can integrate wireless sensors and mobile networks to control farming conditions in real-time. (Abd El-Kader and Mohammad El-Basioni, 2013; Isik et al., 2017). In addition, farmers through the technology can collect meaningful data, which is used to produce low-cost, high-quality crops in terms of precision agriculture (Vasisht et al., 2017). Each sensor and network system has advantages and disadvantages, and farmers can implement high-efficiency, low-cost by selecting the proper sensors and networks in consideration of their farm conditions and working environment. In addition, so far, the ambient environment management is used more in an individual field rather than the entire agricultural field, thus there is a need for improvement to expand plant production technology to a wide range of agriculture (Talavera et al., 2017; Tzounis et al., 2017). In particular, sensors used in precision agriculture have a major impact on crop growth and environmental control according to accuracy. Therefore, it is necessary to review existing sensors, network systems and technology for the extended application of plant production technology in agriculture.

Sensors of cultivation environment and plant growth monitoring

Various types of sensors were used for smart agriculture to collect data from multiple aspects of agriculture, such as the plant, substrate, environment and etc. Such sensors are used for collecting real-time data about multiple agricultural parameters, such as soil data, climate data, luminosity, CO2 concentration and images as shown in Table 1. Various soil sensors were used, and most were used to monitor the soil condition in real time through data measurement on temperature and humidity, or to perform environmental control under optimal conditions for plant growth in a greenhouse (Fisher et al., 2018; Im et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2017). On the other hand, most of the air temperature and air humidity sensors used Arduino-based sensors. The Arduino-based sensor has the advantage of easy environmental control considering the factors that influence each other in the greenhouse, and in particular, optimal control according to the relationship between temperature and humidity is possible (Codeluppi et al., 2020; Mahmud et al., 2018; Mohanraj et al., 2016). Illuminance is one of the most important factors for plants in a greenhouse. An optical sensor module is used to control the brightness, and it can use artificial light can also be used to help plants to grow. Grow lights are used to stimulate plant growth where there is no sufficient sunlight or in places where daylight hours are less (Mohanraj et al., 2016; Syafarinda et al., 2018). The Low CO2 concentrations reduce the plant photosynthetic rate and affect plant growth. An excessively high CO2 concentration causes a partial closure of plant stomata, which affects plant photosynthesis. Therefore, many studies have used a sensor that output voltage value changes according to the concentration of CO2 to maintain or control the appropriate amount of CO2 (Gao et al., 2018; Mahmud et al., 2018). For plant growth monitoring, cameras and multispectral sensors were used to collect images of plants (Han et al., 2018; Xue et al., 2019).

Table 1. Types of physical sensors and use in greenhouse. http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/pastj/images/PASTJ_22-006_image/Table_PASTJ_22-006_T1.png

Embedded system platforms for environment control and plant growth monitoring

Table 2 shows the embedded system used in the greenhouse. In general, it shows that Arduino is the most commonly used embedded system platform. This is because Arduino is an open source hardware that allows to develop a variety of devices using boards that extend the basic functionality. The Arduino Uno is an open source microcontroller board for IoT implementations. The microcontroller board is directly connected to multiple calibrated sensors to measure soil and environmental parameters (Cruz et al., 2018; Zervopoulos et al., 2020), ambient control (Erazo-Rodas et al., 2018; Fernández-Ahumada et al., 2019; Karimah et al., 2019; Mungai Bryan et al., 2019), and plant growth monitoring (Bhimanpallewar and Narasingarao, 2018; Montoya et al., 2017; Sarat Chandra and Srinivas Ravi, 2016)

Table 2. Embedded system platforms and application in greenhouse.http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/pastj/images/PASTJ_22-006_image/Table_PASTJ_22-006_T2.png

Raspberry acts as an edge node that filters and preprocesses IoT data with the help of the TensorFlow Lite library using the server. This server collects IoT sensor data coming from IoT-Edge gateways, filters and removes possible noise, and discards repeated frames to avoid unnecessary transmission to cloud services. Recently, research related to intelligent edge-IoT platform control using Raspberry was performed, and soil management research was conducted through an expert system that integrated sensor network and artificial intelligence system to evaluate agricultural land suitability (Cruz et al., 2018; Zervopoulos et al., 2020). In addition, research related to environmental control using a relatively inexpensive Raspberry microcontroller was conducted (Campos et al., 2020; Rivas-Sánchez et al., 2019), and research related to the development of a precision agricultural monitoring system using wireless sensors and ubiquitous sensors was conducted (Alonso et al., 2020; Ferrández-Pastor et al., 2016; Navulur et al., 2017).

ESP is the module which is needed to be programmed using the micro-C with the AT+Commands. The serial terminal was used to send commands, these commands used to connect the module with a Wi-Fi router. This Wi-Fi router was acting as a medium between PC and embedded device (Sarat Chandra and Srinivas Ravi, 2016). ESP is mostly used based on Wi-Fi, and is mainly applied to the monitoring system within the greenhouse in consideration of the communication range (Aliev et al., 2018; Bhimanpallewar and Narasingarao, 2018; Sarat Chandra and Srinivas Ravi, 2016). However, when using a network that is used in a wide range such as LoRaWAN, it is possible to perform environmental control within a large greenhouse (Ali et al., 2019; Karimah et al., 2019).

Communication network protocols in greenhouse

Table 3 shows network protocols used for the IoT solutions of greenhouse. Data obtained with sensor nodes are usually sent to the destination through a wired or wireless network. Among the mentioned network protocols, CAN and Ethernet were the most used ones for wired networks (Laktionov et al., 2019; Radharamana et al., 2019). Likewise, LoRaWAN and protocols for cellular network were the most used protocols for long-range wireless networks (Codeluppi et al., 2020; Gao and Du, 2011; Im et al., 2018; Syafarinda et al., 2018). In general, ZigBee, Wi-Fi (Boonnam et al., 2017; Gao and Du, 2011; Li et al., 2020; Radharamana et al., 2019; Rodríguez et al., 2017; Sarat Chandra and Srinivas Ravi, 2016)and Bluetooth (Ferrández-Pastor et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2020; Steen et al., 2016)were the most used protocols for short and mid-range wireless networks. The maximum distance between sensor nodes in indoor agriculture enables different types of connections. Wired connections are used in small areas, while wireless connections are used in both indoor and outdoor agriculture. Wi-Fi is the most mentioned protocol within the analyzed projects due to its ubiquitous utilization in daily life.

Data processing technologies and application for smart agriculture

Table 4 shows commonly used technologies by application. It also shows that the most commonly used technologies to support data processing are artificial intelligence and big data. Plant monitoring is the type of application that uses the most diverse technologies for data processing (Adam Ibrahim Fakherldin et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2016; Patil and Sakkaravarthi, 2017; Xia et al., 2018). This is because IoT solutions for plant monitoring collect large amounts of data and rely on big data to process this data. Soil management handles a lot of soil data similar to plant monitoring. In particular, AI and big data are mainly used for continuous data acquisition through wireless sensors (González-briones et al., 2018; Jarolímek et al., 2019; Zervopoulos et al., 2020) and optimization of the greenhouse soil environment (Adenugba et al., 2019; Figueroa and Pope, 2017; Vincent et al., 2019). Fuzzy logic was used in IoT solution applications that need to handle multiple variables such as ambient control and plant monitoring (Alpay and Erdem, 2018; Liu et al., 2015). Fuzzy logic was used to process several temperature and humidity variables in the greenhouse and determine when to start the cooling system and ambient control system (Mungai Bryan et al., 2019). Similarly, fuzzy logic used to optimize the number of sensors to monitor soil temperature and moisture (Karimah et al., 2019)

Table 3. Network protocols and application in greenhouse.http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/pastj/images/PASTJ_22-006_image/Table_PASTJ_22-006_T3.png
Table 4. Information process technologies and application in greenhouse.http://dam.zipot.com:8080/sites/pastj/images/PASTJ_22-006_image/Table_PASTJ_22-006_T4.png

Conclusion

This study reviewed the sensors, embedded system platforms, communication network technologies and the data processing technologies used in the greenhouse. Recent work has shown an increasing use of these systems as well as data management systems. Cloud and big data computing technologies for processing large amounts of data and data are mainly used for the management of the recent greenhouse. Additionally, recent studies have confirmed that the use of artificial intelligence technology to maintain or improve the environment of smart agriculture has become commonplace. Various sensors could be used simultaneously in conjunction with various network protocols for smart agriculture. A comparison of networks for smart agriculture also showed that wired networks (e.g., CAN; Ethernet) are used indoors in small area, whereas wireless networks (e.g., Bluethooth; ZigBee; WiFi; LoRaWAN; Celluar) are mainly used in large-sized greenhouses or when wireless control and real-time management are required from outside. Bluetooth and ZigBee have a relatively low date rate compared to WiFi, but low-power design is possible. LoRaWAN has low date rate, but it can communicate over a wide range. Cellular (e.g., 5G, 4G/LTE, etc.) can be used at the highest speed over the widest range, but consumes a lot of power. Bluetooth and ZigBee-based sensors are advantageous when measuring crop temperature and indoor environment in real time, and are mainly used when the main PC is configured within a maximum distance of 100 m. LoRaWAN and WiFi is used when fusion of various sensors in a larger space. Celluar is used to control the environment from inside or outside with a mobile phone.Therefore, it is very important to adopt the communication technology suitable for the agricultural environment. It also suggests the growing relevance of IoT solutions for smart agriculture. In the future, it is judged that it is necessary to conduct research related to the optimal design of a smart greenhouse in consideration of configuration cost and efficiency through IoT applications. In addition, it is necessary to develop technologies applicable to greenhouses through the expansion of big data and AI technologies mainly used for plant monitoring.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry(IPET) through Advanced Production Technology Development Program, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA)(320025-3)

References

1 Abd El-Kader, S.M., Mohammad El-Basioni, B.M., 2013. Precision farming solution in Egypt using the wireless sensor network technology. Egypt. Informatics J. 14, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2013.06.004  

2 Adam Ibrahim Fakherldin, M., Adam, K., Akma Abu Bakar, N., Abdul Majid, M., 2019. Weather Data Analysis Using Hadoop: Applications and Challenges. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 551. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/551/1/012044  

3 Adenugba, F., Misra, S., Maskeliūnas, R., Damaševičius, R., Kazanavičius, E., 2019. Smart irrigation system for environmental sustainability in Africa: An Internet of Everything (IoE) approach. Math. Biosci. Eng. 16, 5490–5503. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2019273    

4 Ali, A.H., Chisab, R.F., Mnati, M.J., 2019. A smart monitoring and controlling for agricultural pumps using LoRa IOT technology. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 13, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v13.i1.pp286-292  

5 Aliev, K., Jawaid, M.M., Narejo, S., Pasero, E., Pulatov, A., 2018. Internet of plants application for smart agriculture. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 9, 421–429. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090458  

6 Alonso, R.S., Sittón-Candanedo, I., García, Ó., Prieto, J., Rodríguez-González, S., 2020. An intelligent Edge-IoT platform for monitoring livestock and crops in a dairy farming scenario. Ad Hoc Networks 98, 102047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.102047  

7 Alpay, Ö., Erdem, E., 2018. The control of greenhouses based on fuzzy logic using wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 12, 190–203. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.2018.125905641  

8 Bhimanpallewar, R., Narasingarao, M.R., 2018. A prototype model for continuous agriculture field monitoring and assessment. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7, 179–182. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.7.10288  

9 Boonnam, N., Pitakphongmetha, J., Kajornkasirat, S., Horanont, T., Somkiadcharoen, D., Prapakornpilai, J., 2017. Optimal Plant Growth in Smart Farm Hydroponics System using the Integration of Wireless Sensor Networks into Internet of Things. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. 2, 1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj0203127  

10 Campos, N.G.S., Rocha, A.R., Gondim, R., da Silva, T.L.C., Gomes, D.G., 2020. Smart & green: An internet-of-things framework for smart irrigation. Sensors (Switzerland) 20, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010190      

11 Codeluppi, G., Cilfone, A., Davoli, L., Ferrari, G., 2020. LoraFarM: A LoRaWAN-based smart farming modular IoT architecture. Sensors (Switzerland) 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20072028      

12 Cruz, F.R.G., Ballado, A.H., Alcala, A.K.A., Legaspi, A.K.S., Lozada, E.L., Portugal, V.L.P., 2018. Wireless soil moisture detection with time drift compensation. AIP Conf. Proc. 2045. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5080874  

13 Dhall, R., Agrawal, H., 2018. An improved energy efficient duty cycling algorithm for IoT based precision agriculture. Procedia Comput. Sci. 141, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.159  

14 Erazo-Rodas, M., Sandoval-Moreno, M., Muñoz-Romero, S., Huerta, M., Rivas-Lalaleo, D., Naranjo, C., Rojo-álvarez, J.L., 2018. Multiparametric monitoring in equatorian tomato greenhouses (I): Wireless sensor network benchmarking. Sensors (Switzerland) 18, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082555      

15 FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2017. The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges.  

16 Fernández-Ahumada, L.M., Ramírez-Faz, J., Torres-Romero, M., López-Luque, R., 2019. Proposal for the design of monitoring and operating irrigation networks based on IoT, cloud computing and free hardware technologies. Sensors (Switzerland) 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19102318      

17 Ferrández-Pastor, F.J., García-Chamizo, J.M., Nieto-Hidalgo, M., Mora-Pascual, J., Mora-Martínez, J., 2016. Developing ubiquitous sensor network platform using internet of things: Application in precision agriculture. Sensors (Switzerland) 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16071141      

18 Figueroa, M., Pope, C., 2017. Root System Water Consumption Pattern Identification on Time Series Data. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061410      

19 Fisher, D.K., Woodruff, L.K., Anapalli, S.S., Pinnamaneni, S.R., 2018. Open-source wireless cloud-connected agricultural sensor network. J. Sens. Actuator Networks 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan7040047  

20 Gao, G., Jia, Y., Xiao, K., 2018. An IOT-based multi-sensor ecological shared farmland management system. Int. J. Online Eng. 14, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v14i03.8199  

21 Gao, J., Du, H., 2011. Design of greenhouse surveillance system based on embedded web server technology. Procedia Eng. 23, 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2516  

22 González-briones, A., Castellanos-garzón, J.A., Martín, Y.M., Prieto, J., Corchado, J.M., 2018. A Framework for Knowledge Discovery from Wireless Sensor Networks in Rural Environments : A Crop Irrigation Systems Case Study 2018.  

23 Han, L., Yang, G., Yang, H., Xu, B., Li, Z., Yang, X., 2018. Clustering field-based maize phenotyping of plant-height growth and canopy spectral dynamics using a UAV remote-sensing approach. Front. Plant Sci. 871, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01638      

24 Hong, L.S., Sa, Z.S., Yan, J., 2016. Environment Factors Monitoring System Based on CAN bus. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 12, 9–13.Im, H., Lee, S., Naqi, M., Lee, C., Kim, S., 2018. Flexible PI-based plant drought stress sensor for real-time monitoring system in smart farm. Electron. 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics7070114  

25 Isik, M.F., Haboglu, M.R., Isik, E., 2017. A Monitoring and Control System Integrated with Smart Phones for The Efficient Use of Underground Water Resources in Agricultural Product Growing. Hittite J. Sci. Eng. 4, 99–103. https://doi.org/10.17350/hjse19030000055  

26 Jarolímek, J., Pavlík, J., Kholova, J., Ronanki, S., 2019. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics Data Pre-processing for Agricultural Simulations XI, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2019.110105.Introduction  

27 Karimah, S.A., Rakhmatsyah, A., Suwastika, N.A., 2019. Smart pot implementation using fuzzy logic. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1192. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1192/1/012058  

28 Kim, S., Lee, M., Shin, C., 2018. IoT-based strawberry disease prediction system for smart farming. Sensors (Switzerland) 18, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18114051      

29 Kim, T. hoon, Solanki, V.S., Baraiya, H.J., Mitra, A., Shah, H., Roy, S., 2020. A smart, sensible agriculture system using the exponential moving average model. Symmetry (Basel). 12, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12030457  

30 Laktionov, I.S., Vovna, O. V., Bashkov, Y.O., Zori, A.A., Lebediev, V.A., 2019. Improved computer-oriented method for processing of measurement information on greenhouse microclimate. Int. J. Bioautomation 23, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.7546/ijba.2019.23.1.71-86  

31 Li, H., Cryer, S., Acharya, L., Raymond, J., 2020. Video and image classification using atomisation spray image patterns and deep learning. Biosyst. Eng. 200, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.08.016Lin, H., Cai, K., Chen, H., Zeng, Z.F., 2015. (Paper 10 Tafur). Int. J. Online Eng. 11, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v11i6.4847  

32 Liu, N., Cao, W., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Pang, F., Ni, J., 2016. Node deployment with k-connectivity in sensor networks for crop information full coverage monitoring. Sensors (Switzerland) 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122096      

33 Liu, N., Cao, W., Zhu, Y., Zhang, J., Pang, F., Ni, J., 2015. The node deployment of intelligent sensor networks based on the spatial difference of farmland soil. Sensors (Switzerland) 15, 28314–28339. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151128314      

34 Mahmud, M.S.A., Buyamin, S., Mokji, M.M., Abidin, M.S.Z., 2018. Internet of things based smart environmental monitoring for mushroom cultivation. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 10, 847–852. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v10.i3.pp847-852  

35 Mohanraj, I., Ashokumar, K., Naren, J., 2016. Field Monitoring and Automation Using IOT in Agriculture Domain. Procedia Comput. Sci. 93, 931–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.275  

36 Montoya, E.A.Q., Colorado, S.F.J., Muñoz, W.Y.C., Golondrino, G.E.C., 2017. Proposal of an Architecture for Precision Agriculture Supported in IoT. RISTI - Rev. Ibérica Sist. e Tecnol. Informação 24, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.17013/risti.24.39-56  

37 Mungai Bryan, N., Fei Thang, K., Vinesh, T., 2019. An Urban Based Smart IOT Farming System. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 268. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/268/1/012038  

38 Munir, M.S., Bajwa, I.S., Naeem, M.A., Ramzan, B., 2018. Design and implementation of an IoT system for smart energy consumption and smart irrigation in tunnel farming. Energies 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123427  

39 Navulur, S., Sastry, A.S.C.S., Giri Prasad, M.N., 2017. Agricultural management through wireless sensors and internet of things. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 7, 3492–3499. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v7i6.pp3492-3499  

40 Patil, S.M., Sakkaravarthi, R., 2017. Internet of things based smart agriculture system using predictive analytics. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 10, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10s1.19601  

41 Radharamana, K.K.P., Mouli, C., Kumar, U., 2019. Web architecture for monitoring field using representational state transfer methods. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst. 12, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.22266/IJIES2019.0228.09  

42 Ray, P.P., 2016. A survey of IoT cloud platforms. Futur. Comput. Informatics J. 1, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcij.2017.02.001  

43 Rivas-Sánchez, Y.A., Moreno-Pérez, M.F., Roldán-Cañas, J., 2019. Environment control with low-cost microcontrollers and microprocessors: Application for green walls. Sustain. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030782  

44 Rodríguez, S., Gualotuña, T., Grilo, C., 2017. A System for the Monitoring and Predicting of Data in Precision Agriculture in a Rose Greenhouse Based on Wireless Sensor Networks. Procedia Comput. Sci. 121, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.042  

45 Sarat Chandra, G., Srinivas Ravi, K., 2016. Effective architecture for greenhouse controlling and monitoring using Wi-Fi peer to peer direct protocol. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i17/92975  

46 Steen, K.A., Christiansen, P., Karstoft, H., Jørgensen, R.N., 2016. Using deep learning to challenge safety standard for highly autonomous machines in agriculture. J. Imaging 2, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging2010006  

47 Syafarinda, Y., Akhadin, F., Fitri, Z.E., Yogiswara, Widiawanl, B., Rosdiana, E., 2018. The Precision Agriculture Based on Wireless Sensor Network with MQTT Protocol. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 207. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/207/1/012059  

48 Talavera, J.M., Tobón, L.E., Gómez, J.A., Culman, M.A., Aranda, J.M., Parra, D.T., Quiroz, L.A., Hoyos, A., Garreta, L.E., 2017. Review of IoT applications in agro-industrial and environmental fields. Comput. Electron. Agric. 142, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.015  

49 Tzounis, A., Katsoulas, N., Bartzanas, T., Kittas, C., 2017. Internet of Things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges. Biosyst. Eng. 164, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.007  

50 Vasisht, D., Chandra, R., Kapoor, A., Sinha, S.N., Sudarshan, M., Stratman, S., Kapetanovic, Z., Won, J., Jin, X., 2017. This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 14th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’17). FarmBeats: An IoT Platform for Data-Driven Agriculture FarmBeats: An IoT Platform for Data-Driven Agriculture.Verdouw, C., Sundmaeker, H., Tekinerdogan, B., Conzon, D., Montanaro, T., 2019. Architecture framework of IoT-based food and farm systems: A multiple case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104939  

51 Vincent, D.R., Deepa, N., Elavarasan, D., Srinivasan, K., Chauhdary, S.H., Iwendi, C., 2019. Sensors driven ai-based agriculture recommendation model for assessing land suitability. Sensors (Switzerland) 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173667      

52 Xia, J., Yang, Y., Cao, H., Zhang, Weixin, Xu, L., Wang, Q., Ke, Y., Zhang, Wenyu, Ge, D., Huang, B., 2018. Hyperspectral identification and classification of oilseed rape waterlogging stress levels using parallel computing. IEEE Access 6, 57663–57675. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2873689  

53 Xue, J., Fan, Y., Su, B., Fuentes, S., 2019. Assessment of canopy vigor information from kiwifruit plants based on a digital surface model from unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 12, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.4634  

54 Zervopoulos, A., Tsipis, A., Alvanou, A.G., Bezas, K., Papamichail, A., Vergis, S., Stylidou, A., Tsoumanis, G., Komianos, V., Koufoudakis, G., Oikonomou, K., 2020. Wireless sensor network synchronization for precision agriculture applications. Agric. 10, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10030089  

55 Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Li, L., Zhang, Y., Yang, G., 2017. Monitoring citrus soil moisture and nutrients using an IoT based system. Sensors (Switzerland) 17, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17030447